The Path to “Constructive Virtues”
My first published
essays were as installments in my newspaper column “@ChumForThought,” published
in the Dayton Review. “Chum” is the word for chopped fish
waste that is thrown overboard to attract other fish – especially sharks. I
believe that comparing ideas can be a force for good that attracts us to each
other. Strangers often become friends as they talk and work together, uniting
to solve mutual problems.
The column was intended for my neighbors in a small, rural,
Iowa town. I hoped to encourage conservatives to think about their ideas and
liberals to come out of the closet. This book, Constructive Virtues, extends my collected essays – largely on
similar, and sometimes contentious, themes.
Many people prefer to avoid controversy as they would avoid
swimming with sharks. You sometimes hear
friends say, “I’ll talk about anything but politics and religion.” I can understand their reluctance and, if a friend tells me that, I’ll be the first one to back off and respect his or her need for comfortable beliefs without challenge or doubt.
friends say, “I’ll talk about anything but politics and religion.” I can understand their reluctance and, if a friend tells me that, I’ll be the first one to back off and respect his or her need for comfortable beliefs without challenge or doubt.
However, as Proverbs 27:17 says, “As iron sharpens iron, so
one man sharpens another.” I think it is good to compare notes and discuss
ideas. We make both our companions and ourselves better for the time we spend
trying to understand each other.
If we withdraw and refuse to talk, empathize, think or
compromise with each other, we denounce our brotherhood. People who can’t talk
together become suspicious and divided. They become fearful and hateful. They
become enemies. They often resort to combat to resolve their differences.
Unthinking alienation is not the path to peace, security and common good.
Too many people are too ready to, out of hand, disparage and
denounce beliefs held by groups other than their own. They forget that other
groups’ sincere beliefs exist because they are believed to be virtuous! This
realization should automatically give pause for thought.
Refusing to consider
another’s worldview damages our potential for understanding, intellectual
growth and psychosocial development. Ignorance is rarely considered a noble
virtue. How can anyone consider that ignorantly rejecting another’s beliefs,
values and virtues might be a good thing?
It is often pointed out that gossip, by only discussing people,
can be damaging. It can useful to know what is going on and discuss events.
However, I believe that we become better people when we choose to compare and
discuss ideas.
The ability to communicate about issues, including our
values, is what draws us together as friends, families and communities. When we
can communicate, we can work together to solve problems; we can unite for
common goals and for our common good.
David Satterlee
No comments:
Post a Comment