Information and comments on the essay:
The thing about “Real War” – victors and vanquished
From the book: Chum for Thought: Throwing Ideas into Dangerous Waters by David Satterlee
Find out more, including where to buy books and ebooks
Read or download this essay as a PDF file at: https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B4eNv8KtePyKLUY4TElYdW9IRzA/edit?usp=sharing#military #power
![]() |
Chum For Thought: Throwing Ideas into Dangerous Waters |
The thing about “Real War” – victors and vanquished
Very few people now alive have had the experience of what I
think of as “Real War.” Oh, we still use the word “war,” but it doesn’t seem to
carry the same sense of dramatic finality that it formerly did. War, and our
thinking about war, has gotten soft. Our changing values affect the way we
respond to the victors and victims of war.
These days, our wars tend to earn euphemisms such as: border
skirmish, police action, regime change, nation building, civil uprising,
popular revolution, government standoff, and gorilla opposition. Similarly,
killing becomes: targeting, eliminating, taking out, and collateral damage because
the idea is too repulsive to be named as what it is without shame. We rarely
see Group A attacking Group B with the intent of killing or enslaving everyone
and taking all of their land and property.
And, of course, Real War only begets
more war. Yeah, Real War used to really mean something.
The incomprehensible and unconscionable violence of World
War II so scared the crap out of