Terrorism is a symptom of persistent social problems. It
seeks to express resistance and create change by means of out-sized aggression.
It uses “blind criminal violence” to motivate others to include the terrorist
in their calculus of choices and behavior – or weaken themselves by reacting
poorly.
Terrorism is usually a form of communication that is meant
to produce powerful emotional responses. Whatever motivates any given
terrorist, we are obliged to notice their act. Certainly, understanding
terrorists’ motives is vital to designing an appropriate counter-terrorism
response. Terrorism is not a single-issue problem and does not have a
single-tactic solution.
Several years ago, I had the opportunity to discuss
terrorism with James Hippensteel, a professor of history in North Carolina. He
startled me with an observation that I remember as: “Terrorism is the last
resort of the desperate and impotent to gain recognition of their grievances
and prosecute their struggle against a superior and overwhelming power.” Dr.
Hippensteel was careful to point out that he was not arguing that the use of
terrorism was defensible but that, like smoke from a fire, it should be
recognized as an indicator of an underlying unresolved issue.
Initially, I thought this “last desperate resort”
observation on terrorism only applied to those who were oppressed and
disenfranchised. These might include peoples experiencing genocide, slavery or
subjugation. I thought of these as fundamentally sympathetic people,
deserving empathy and active intercession. There are certainly many
whose lives feel so hopeless that it becomes easier to choose to die than
continue to struggle. And, why not die with honor, believing your death has
meaning?
Eventually, it occurred to me that terrorism is also used by
those who are very isolated and inflexible such as primitive tribes,
authoritarian religions, and the politically indoctrinated. I thought of these
people as deserving careful nurturing while they are encouraged to learn
how to relate to their neighbors with greater maturity.
Later, I recognized that terrorists include some who simply
seek to gain some advantage and have no compunctions about hurting others to
get what they want. I think of these as sociopaths, deserving contempt and
active prosecution to prevent their continuing aggression.
Finally, just when I was self-satisfied with my analysis and
deconstruction, I realized that most terrorists fall under more than one of
these categories. The world’s problems are complicated and any effort to resolve
them requires well-informed, nuanced, manifold, dynamic and flexible responses.
Topics included below:
- Terrorism Motives and Objectives
- Counterterrorism Tactics — Methods and Options
- Strategic Responses to Terrorism
- Summary
