Information and comments on the essay:
Dis-integrating old beliefs
From the book: Chum for Thought: Throwing Ideas into Dangerous Waters by David Satterlee
Find out more, including where to buy books and ebooks
Read or download this essay as a PDF file at: https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B4eNv8KtePyKTW1ENEN0aTRMUVk/edit?usp=sharing#Faith #Integral #Psychosocial
Chum For Thought: Throwing Ideas into Dangerous Waters |
Dis-integrating old beliefs
I have recently been challenged that my comments threaten to
“dis-integrate” people’s beliefs and that this comes off as “threatening and
painful” to them. Thus, I am being rude, inconsiderate, and unsociably
aggressive. Talk about a curve ball! I just didn’t see that one coming.
The concept is that most people are already quite satisfied
with their sources of authority and their beliefs. They believe things that are
similar to what their friends believe and this makes them feel comfortable and
secure. They feel that their existing beliefs all make sense together (are
integrated). Thus, it is not nice for someone like me to come along and upset their
apple cart.
I chewed on this problem for a while before it occurred to
me to launch from, “What Would Jesus Do?” Actually, Jesus published a new
gospel and admitted that he came to cause division, rather than peace. He
warned his disciples that they and their new message would encounter violent
resistance. I don’t mean to compare myself to Jesus – only to point out that
there come times when one’s ideas have to transcend comfortable and familiar
traditions.
While having a similar discussion with my youngest son, he
proposed a model of
desirable dis-integration. He pointed out that, in the Bible, God’s people sometimes had to make a complete shift in their understanding and even their ways of worship in order to conform to God’s will.
desirable dis-integration. He pointed out that, in the Bible, God’s people sometimes had to make a complete shift in their understanding and even their ways of worship in order to conform to God’s will.
Noah had to turn his back on his neighbors and build an ark.
Abraham had to pack up his family and move out of Ur. Moses had to lead an
entire nation into the wilderness. God repeatedly gave the Israelites judges,
kings, and prophets. Jesus introduced an entirely new covenant.
In every case, His people had to make individual choices to
take a new path or be left behind. It became a personal necessity to
voluntarily choose to dis-integrate their previous ways of thinking.
Isn’t it the accepted responsibility of parents, teachers,
and various leaders to help others to grow and to change? In fact, anyone who
has been-there-done-that and found-a-better-way should feel obliged to share
their discovery, if only to give it some exercise. Who knows? They may have the
next new best thing. Wouldn't it be wrong to withhold an idea that could help
others, even at the risk of disrupting their favorite beliefs? Maybe the world
isn’t actually flat.
Considering myself as open to new ideas, I am constantly on
the prowl for something that will profitably dis-integrate old notions. As I’ve
previously mentioned, individuals and cultures continuously develop through a
series of predictable stages, each of which enfolds but transcends the last. Or
they stagnate, holding on to comfortable preconceived notions.
It is only when a previous worldview fails to serve our
needs in new circumstances that dis-integration is required. Dis-integration
allows us to advance so that a new worldview may be integrated. And, Lord
knows, we need to adapt to new circumstances with more and more agility in this
rapidly-changing modern world.
No comments:
Post a Comment